HENRY v. HARRIS

Patent Appeal No. 2899.

56 F.2d 864 (1932)

HENRY v. HARRIS.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 4, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Brown, Jackson, Boettcher & Dienner, of Chicago, Ill. (Arthur H. Boettcher, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for appellant.

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio (Watts T. Estabrook, of Washington, D. C., and B. M. Kent, of Cleveland, Ohio, of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, affirming a decision of the Examiner of Interferences, awarding priority to Harris.

The claimed invention is directed to the use, in spring shackles for automobiles, of bushings, composed of elastic material, arranged to accommodate the pivotal movement between the parts by the yielding of the bushing material. That is to say, the elastic...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases