1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 54 F.2d
  5. 54 F.2d 815 (1932)
 

IN RE TUCKER

Patent Appeal No. 2552.

54 F.2d 815 (1932)

In re TUCKER et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

January 4, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

V. M. Dorsey, of Washington, D. C. (Melville Church and Sidney F. Parham, both of Washington, D. C., and Lloyd G. Bates, of Hartford, Conn., of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for the Commissioner of Patents.

George A. Prevost, of Washington, D. C., amicus curiæ

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

On January 21, 1931, this court, in Re Oliver M. Tucker and William A. Reeves, 46 F.2d 214, 18 C. C. P. A. 875, affirmed the action of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office in its rejection of appellants' claims 1, 12, 45, and 46, which were intended to cover shear structure for glass machinery. Claim 12 is illustrative, we think, and reads: "12. A shear structure comprising a pair of shears...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases