1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 58 F.2d
  5. 58 F.2d 459 (1932)
 

IN RE HEIJKENSKJOLD

Patent Appeal No. 2994.

58 F.2d 459 (1932)

In re HEIJKENSKJOLD.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 23, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cameron, Kerkam & Sutton, of Washington, D. C. (W. B. Kerkam and R. H. Hudson, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

GARRETT, Associate Judge.

This appeal is from a decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming a decision of the Examiner rejecting, for lack of invention in view of the prior art, the three claims of an application for patent upon alleged improvements in bathing plants.

Claim 31 is quoted as typical: "A floating bathing plant comprising a swimming tank filled with water and floating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases