IN RE MARTIN

Patent Appeal No. 2981.

58 F.2d 453 (1932)

In re MARTIN.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

May 23, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Albert L. Ely, of Akron, Ohio (J. Ralph Barrow, of Akron, Ohio, of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C. (Howard S. Miller, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


GARRETT, Associate Judge.

Four claims (being all the claims) of an application for patent on a method of making rubber tires were rejected by the Examiner of the United States Patent Office on the ground that they disclosed no invention in view of the prior art. His decision was affirmed by the Board of Appeals. From the latter decision appellant appeals to this court.

Claim 5 appears to be typical: "5. The method of making tires comprising building roughly...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases