1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 62 F.2d
  5. 62 F.2d 378 (1932)
 

WILLIAMS OIL-O-MATIC HEAT. CORP. v. WESTINGHOUSE E. & M. CO.

Patent Appeal No. 3018.

62 F.2d 378 (1932)

WILLIAMS OIL-O-MATIC HEATING CORPORATION v. WESTINGHOUSE ELECTRIC & MFG. CO.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 27, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Langdon Moore, of Washington, D. C. (James Atkins, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

O. H. Eschholz, of East Pittsburgh, Pa. (Birney Hines, of East Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Examiner of Interferences dismissing the notice of opposition of appellant, and holding that appellee was entitled to the registration of the trade-mark "Adjust-O-Matic," for use on adjustable and thermostatically controlled electric sadirons — flatirons.

In its notice of opposition, as amended, the Williams Oil-O-Matic Heating...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases