IN RE MAVROGENIS

Patent Appeal No. 2915.

57 F.2d 361 (1932)

In re MAVROGENIS.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 4, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur R. Woolfolk, of Milwaukee, Wis. (Alvin Juedes and Leonard J. Kleczka, both of Milwaukee, Wis., and A. V. Cushman, John J. Darby, and Carl A. Hellmann, all of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for Commissioner of Patents.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

In this case the appellant seeks to have this court review and reverse the decision of the Commissioner of Patents, who refused to revive appellant's application for improvements in wireless receiving systems, filed October 19, 1923. Petitioner sought to have the Commissioner of Patents revive the application under the authority granted in section 4894 of the Revised Statutes, 35 USCA § 37, the pertinent portion of which is as follows...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases