WOOLSEY, District Judge.
My judgment is that claims Nos. 1, 2, 4, 5, 6, 7, 8, and 9 of United States patent No. 1,700,535, involved in this cause, are invalid for want of invention, and also by reason of the plaintiff's constructive abandonment of the device which he sought to patent by its commercial sale in substantially the same form more than two years prior to his application for a patent.
Accordingly a decree may be entered dismissing the bill of complaint...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.