1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 59 F.2d
  5. 59 F.2d 80 (1932)
 

THOMAS KERFOOT & CO. v. LOUIS K. LIGGETT CO.

No. 3247.

59 F.2d 80 (1932)

THOMAS KERFOOT & CO., Limited, v. LOUIS K. LIGGETT CO.

District Court, D. Massachusetts.

May 21, 1932.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mock & Blum, of New York City, and Arthur P. Hardy, of Boston, Mass., for plaintiff.

Gaston, Snow, Saltonstall & Hunt, of Boston, Mass., Thomas Hunt, of Boston, Mass., and Edward S. Rogers, of New York City, for defendant.

HALE, District Judge.

In this case the plaintiff alleges that in the year 1915 it put on the market an entirely novel pharmaceutical preparation to be used as an inhalant for the relief of colds in the head.

That upon putting this novel preparation on the market, it adopted the word "Vapex" as a trade-mark, and that under this mark the product has been continuously sold in England since July 7, 1915, and in the United States since 1922.

That, at the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases