DUBISKE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE

No. 4611.

58 F.2d 51 (1932)

DUBISKE v. COMMISSIONER OF INTERNAL REVENUE.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Seventh Circuit.

April 6, 1932.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

George I. Haight, of Chicago, Ill., Charles D. Hamel, of Washington, D. C., Irvin H. Fathchild, of Chicago, Ill., and Benjamin H. Saunders, of Washington, D. C., for petitioners.

G. A. Youngquist, Asst. Atty. Gen., and Sewell Key and A. G. Divet, Sp. Assts. to Atty. Gen. (C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Eugene M. Meacham, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for respondent.

Before ALSCHULER, EVANS, and SPARKS, Circuit Judges.


SPARKS, Circuit Judge.

Pursuant to sections 1001-1003 of the Revenue Act of 1926, c. 27, 44 Stat. 9, 109, 110 (26 USCA §§ 1224 and note, 1225, 1226), petitioner seeks to review an order of the Board of Tax Appeals. The order redetermined deficiencies in petitioner's income taxes for the years 1920 and 1921, aggregating $202,526.50, which includes a fraud penalty of $67,508.84.

In 1917, H. W. Dubiske & Co., hereinafter referred to as Dubiske ...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases