MACK, Circuit Judge.
The question presented on the exceptions is whether or not the cargo owner can hold the Hustler for any part of the expenses incurred by it in removing and dumping the damaged cargo.
The special commissioner has found in favor of the cargo owner. In my opinion, error has been committed in this respect, in view of the evidence that the sound cargo was first removed. After the sound cargo had been removed, the cargo owner was under no obligation...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
