1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 49 F.2d
  5. 49 F.2d 886 (1931)
 

SUN RAY GAS CORP. v. BELLOWS-CLAUDE NEON CO.

No. 5644.

49 F.2d 886 (1931)

SUN RAY GAS CORPORATION et al. v. BELLOWS-CLAUDE NEON CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

May 12, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kwis, Hudson & Kent, Lloyd L. Evans, and A. J. Hudson, all of Cleveland, Ohio, and George F. Scull, of New York City, for appellants.

Harold Elno Smith, of Cleveland, Ohio, and William Bohleber, of New York City (Smith & Freeman, of Cleveland, Ohio, and Francis H. Fassett, of Dayton, Ohio, on the brief), for appellees.

Before DENISON, HICKS, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.

HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

Appellants urge the invalidity of claim 1 of patent No. 1,125,476, for a "system of illuminating by luminescent [neon] tubes" (issued January 19, 1915, upon application of Georges Claude), upon the ground of insufficient disclosure in the specification upon the allegedly essential and all-important subject of pressure; and because the claim, printed in the margin,1 has used what is said to be a meaningless...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases