1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 45 F.2d
  5. 45 F.2d 842 (1931)
 

HOLLAND FURNACE CO. v. W. H. KRATZER CO.

No. 1840.

45 F.2d 842 (1931)

HOLLAND FURNACE CO. v. W. H. KRATZER CO.

District Court, E. D. Michigan, S. D.

January 3, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Fred L. Chappell and Chappell & Earl, all of Kalamazoo, Mich., for plaintiff.

Murray & Zugelter, of Cincinnati, Ohio, for defendant.

SIMONS, District Judge.

This is a suit for infringement of two patents, Russell 1,589,986, covering a method of cleaning furnaces, and Russell 1,589,987, covering a process for cleaning furnace casings. The issue in respect to each patent is its validity in the face of alleged anticipation and prior public use. If the patents are valid, claim 3 of the first patent in suit, and both of the claims of the second patent, are clearly infringed.

The first patent...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases