ST. JOHN v. SCHULZE

Patent Appeal No. 2596.

47 F.2d 798 (1931)

ST. JOHN et al. v. SCHULZE.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

March 25, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Emery, Booth, Varney & Whittemore, of New York City (Lucius E. Varney, of New York City, Nichol M. Sandoe, of Boston, Mass., M. Whittemore, of New York City, and A. M. Holcombe, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

Steward & McKay, of Washington, D. C. (Roy F. Steward, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


BLAND, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal by St. John and Gray from concurring decisions of the Patent Office tribunals, awarding priority of invention to appellee Schulze.

The invention in issue is a process for producing useful mineral oil distillates, particularly lubricating oils, by distilling certain oil materials under very high vacuum, that is to say, at a very low absolute pressure and under nonoxidizing conditions. The three counts in issue follow...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases