1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 56 F.2d
  5. 56 F.2d 444 (1931)
 

MAULIS v. UNITED STATES

No. 39272.

56 F.2d 444 (1931)

MAULIS v. UNITED STATES.

District Court, N. D. Illinois, E. D.

December 17, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

McKiernan & Smith, of Chicago, Ill., for plaintiff.

George E. Q. Johnson, U. S. Atty., and Thomas Dodd Healy, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Chicago, Ill.

T. R. Callahan, of Washington, D. C., for U. S. Veterans' Bureau.

WOODWARD, District Judge.

The question submitted in this case is as to whether or not a disagreement exists between the plaintiff and the United States Veterans' Bureau, as required by section 19 of the World War Veterans' Act 1924, as amended (38 USCA § 445). If there is a disagreement, the court has jurisdiction further to proceed. If there is no disagreement, then a jurisdictional fact is lacking.

The matter is submitted upon the motion of the defendant...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases