WILLIAMS v. HANDSCHIEGL

No. 2664.

48 F.2d 395 (1931)

WILLIAMS v. HANDSCHIEGL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 15, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Joseph W. Milburn, of Washington, D. C. (Joseph F. Westall and Ernest L. Wallace, both of Los Angeles, Cal., Roger D. Gessford, of Washington, D. C., and Westall & Wallace, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellant.

E. W. Shepard, of Washington, D. C. (Frank L. A. Graham, of Los Angeles, Cal., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal in an interference proceeding from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office affirming the decision of the examiner of interferences awarding priority of invention to the senior party, Max Handschiegl.

The invention relates to a method of producing composite pictures, and is fully described in the single count in issue. The count reads: "The herein described photographic method of producing...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases