OREGON-WASHINGTON R. & NAV. CO. v. UNITED STATES

No. 9113.

47 F.2d 250 (1931)

OREGON-WASHINGTON R. & NAV. CO. (SOUTHERN PAC. CO. et al., Interveners) v. UNITED STATES (INTERSTATE COMMERCE COMMISSION et al., Interveners).

District Court, D. Oregon.

January 29, 1931.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Henry W. Clark, of New York City, J. M. Souby, of Omaha, Neb., and Arthur C. Spencer and Roy F. Shields, both of Portland, Or., for petitioner.

Ben C. Dey, of Portland, Or., Guy V. Shoup, of San Francisco, Cal., and Alfred A. Hampson, of Portland, Or., for intervening plaintiff Southern Pac. Co.

Charles A. Hart, of Portland, Or. (Carey, Hart, Spencer & McCulloch, of Portland, Or., of counsel), for intervening plaintiffs Great Northern Ry. Co., Oregon Trunk Ry., and Oregon Electric Ry. Co.

George Neuner, United States Atty., of Portland, Or.

Daniel W. Knowlton, Chief Counsel, and J. Stanley Payne, Asst. Chief Counsel, both of Washington, D. C., for intervening defendant Interstate Commerce Commission.

I. H. Van Winkle, Atty. Gen., of Oregon, William C. McCulloch, of Portland, Or., and William P. Ellis, of Salem, Or., for intervening defendant Public Service Commission of Oregon.

W. D. Gillis, Atty. Gen. of Idaho, and J. M. Thompson, of Boise, Idaho, for intervening defendant Public Utilities Commission for Idaho.

Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and McNARY, District Judge.


RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

May 24, 1927, the Public Service Commission of the State of Oregon filed its complaint with the Interstate Commerce Commission against the Oregon-Washington Railroad & Navigation Company, the Union Pacific Railroad Company, and a number of other railroads, alleging that the carriers named as parties to the proceeding had failed and refused to provide reasonable and adequate facilities of transportation by railroad to a large area within...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases