1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 40 F.2d
  5. 40 F.2d 897 (1930)
 

SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS CO. v. LA GUE

No. 5856.

40 F.2d 897 (1930)

SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS CO. v. LA GUE et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

May 19, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butler, Van Dyke, Desmond & Harris, of Sacramento, Cal., and E. P. Kelly, of Minneapolis, Minn., for appellant.

Ralph H. Lewis and George McCutchen, both of Sacramento, Cal., and Otis D. Babcock, of Sacramento, Cal., for appellees.

Before DIETRICH and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

There is no question of the statute of limitations and plaintiffs (appellees) make no claim on account of improvements. In most other respects the case is not substantially unlike that of Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Tatham (C. C. A.) 40 F.2d 894, this day decided.

In Iowa, where they were then residing, plaintiffs, on March 30, 1926, contracted to buy from defendant ten acres of the Rio...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases