1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 45 F.2d
  5. 45 F.2d 780 (1930)
 

SOLINSKY v. McPHERSON

No. 6114.

45 F.2d 780 (1930)

Frank J. SOLINSKY, Sr., and Frank J. Solinsky, Jr., Appellants, v. Charles McPHERSON and Ewald J. Pfeiffer, as Special Administrators of the Estate of Charles F. Ruggles, Deceased; John H. Rademaker, Charles McPherson and Amador Timber Company (a Corporation), Appellees.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied January 12, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Peck and Edw. R. Solinsky, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Nutter, Hancock & Rutherford and A. P. Hayne, all of Stockton, Cal., for appellants.

Clyde H. Brand and Downey, Brand & Seymour, all of Sacramento, Cal., for appellees.

Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

PER CURIAM.

The decree is affirmed on the authority of Solinsky v. McPherson et al. (C. C. A., No. 6113), 45 F.2d 778, just decided.

Comment

1000 Characters Remaining

Leagle.com reserves the right to edit or remove comments but is under no obligation to do so, or to explain individual moderation decisions.

User Comments

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases