1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 45 F.2d
  5. 45 F.2d 778 (1930)
 

SOLINSKY v. McPHERSON

No. 6113.

45 F.2d 778 (1930)

SOLINSKY et al. v. McPHERSON et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied January 12, 1931.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

James F. Peck and Edw. R. Solinsky, both of San Francisco, Cal., and Nutter, Hancock & Rutherford and A. P. Hayne, all of Stockton, Cal., for appellants.

Clyde H. Brand, Harry B. Seymour, and Downey, Brand & Seymour, all of Sacramento, Cal., for appellees McPherson and others.

Chickering & Gregory and Blair S. Shuman, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellees Michigan Trust Co., Security Trust Co., and G. C. Thomson.

Before RUDKIN and WILBUR, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

February 20, 1913, Charles F. Ruggles of Manistee, Mich., entered into an agreement with Frank J. Solinsky and Frank J. Solinsky, Jr., of Berkeley, Cal., reciting that, Ruggles had invested in timber and timber lands in Calaveras county, Cal., approximately $1,000,000 belonging to himself and others associated with him; that he contemplated enlarging the investment by acquiring additional lands in the same vicinity; and that the Solinskys had...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases