1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 39 F.2d
  5. 39 F.2d 704 (1930)
 

HARRISON v. CADWELL

Patent Appeal No. 2270.

39 F.2d 704 (1930)

HARRISON et al. v. CADWELL.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

April 14, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

William F. Hall, of Washington, D. C. (Spear, Middleton, Donaldson & Hall, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellants.

George F. Gourley and Walter L. Pipes, both of New York City (Ernest Hopkinson, of New York City, of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

This interference proceeding, which is an appeal from the decision of the Board of Appeals of the United States Patent Office, involves the question of priority of an invention of a process for vulcanizing rubber.

The value of the invention is emphasized by the size of the record (more than 2500 pages) and the briefs (more than 300 pages). There are more than 100 exhibits in the case, and a great number of legal questions are raised...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases