Appellant, Fox, was convicted on two counts of an indictment, the first of which charged that Voelz, Fox, and others "to said grand jurors unknown" conspired to defraud a national bank.
Complaint is made that the first count of the indictment did not sufficiently advise defendant of the nature of the accusation. Although it is suggested that too many substantive offenses are included in a single...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
