SOPER, District Judge.
This case comes before the court on the amended bill of complaint and a motion of the defendant to dismiss the bill. The point involved is whether or not there was any substantial evidence before the deputy commissioner which justified his conclusion of fact reached on April 17, 1929, that John Kranski, the injured man, was entitled to compensation on the basis of temporary partial disability. The theory of the complaint is that there was no...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.
