1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 40 F.2d
  5. 40 F.2d 1018 (1930)
 

PONEMAH MILLS v. UNIVERSAL CREPE & TISSUE MILLS

Patent Appeal No. 2196.

40 F.2d 1018 (1930)

PONEMAH MILLS v. UNIVERSAL CREPE & TISSUE MILLS, Inc.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

June 4, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Kenyon & Kenyon, of New York City (Douglas H. Kenyon and Robert N. Kenyon, both of New York City, and Lee B. Kemon, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellant.

M. S. Meem, of Washington, D. C. (James Atkins, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

PER CURIAM.

In this cause, which is a trade-mark opposition case, appellant, on May 12, 1930, presented a motion that this court reverse the decision of the Commissioner of Patents and direct that appellee be refused the registration sought, basing its motion upon the provision of a decree of the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York.

A certified copy of the decree was filed, from which it appears that it was entered in accordance...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases