1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 923 (1929)
 

SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS CO. v. HAENGGI

No. 5678.

36 F.2d 923 (1929)

SACRAMENTO SUBURBAN FRUIT LANDS CO. v. HAENGGI.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Motion for Modification of Opinion Denied January 13, 1930.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Butler, Van Dyke & Desmond, of Sacramento, Cal., and Arthur C. Huston, of Woodland, Cal., for appellant.

Ralph H. Lewis and George E. McCutchen, both of Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.

Before RUDKIN, DIETRICH, and WILBUR, Circuit Judges.

DIETRICH, Circuit Judge.

In its background this case is like Sacramento Suburban Fruit Lands Co. v. Melin (C. C. A. No. 5671) 36 F.2d 907, this day decided. Several assignments are relied upon by appellant, but we deem it necessary to refer to only those which have to do with instructions relative to "commercial orcharding," a subject briefly commented upon in the Nelson Case (C. C. A. No...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases