CONOVER v. DOWNS

Patent Appeal No. 2129.

35 F.2d 59 (1929)

CONOVER v. DOWNS.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

October 4, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

B. G. Foster, of Washington, D. C., H. Dorsey Spencer, of New York City, and Robt. A. Norton, of Pittsburgh, Pa., for appellant.

W. B. Morton and George J. Hesselman, both of New York City, and Richard K. Stevens and Clarence M. Fisher, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.


HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal, in an interference proceeding, from the decision of the Commissioner of Patents affirming the decision of the Board of Examiners in Chief which, in turn, had affirmed the decision of the Examiner of Interferences awarding priority of invention to appellee, Charles R. Downs.

The invention in issue consists of "A process for removing the excess heat of reaction from a catalytic zone" and is defined in four counts...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases