1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 34 F.2d
  5. 34 F.2d 711 (1929)
 

CLAUDE NEON ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS v. ECKSTEIN

No. 364.

34 F.2d 711 (1929)

CLAUDE NEON ELECTRICAL PRODUCTS, Inc., v. ECKSTEIN et al.

District Court, W. D. Washington, S. D.

March 12, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

G. Wright Arnold, of Seattle, Wash., and Lyon & Lyon, of Los Angeles, Cal., William Bohleber, of New York City, and Reginald E. Caughey, of Los Angeles, Cal., for plaintiff.

Caldwell & Lycette and Weldon G. Bettens, all of Seattle, Wash., for defendants.

CUSHMAN, District Judge.

The evidence offered upon the motion for a preliminary injunction consists of affidavits and an exhibit — one of the signs which plaintiff contends infringes the patent in suit.

Claim 1 of the patent reads: "1. A luminescent tube containing previously purified neon and provided with internal electrodes for illuminating said gas, said electrodes being deprived of occluded gases and having...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases