1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 34 F.2d
  5. 34 F.2d 670 (1929)
 

TRAITEL MARBLE CO. v. U. T. HUNGERFORD BRASS & COPPER CO.

34 F.2d 670 (1929)

TRAITEL MARBLE CO. v. U. T. HUNGERFORD BRASS & COPPER CO.

District Court, S. D New York.

September 18, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Robert W. Hardie, of New York City, for plaintiff.

Darby & Darby, of New York City (Samuel E. Darby, Jr., of New York City, and George D. Seymour, of New Haven, Conn., of counsel), for defendant.

THACHER, District Judge.

In the Circuit Court of Appeals a decree granting a preliminary injunction in this case was affirmed [22 F.2d 259], and it was then held that the patent in suit was valid and unanticipated by anything in the prior art. Among the patents before the Circuit Court of Appeals was the patent to Kahn (No. 1,033,106), which is now urged in anticipation. Reference is also made to four patents (Warmoth, No. 1,226,149...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases