ROSCHEN v. WARD

Nos. 667 and 668.

279 U.S. 337 (1929)

ROSCHEN v. WARD, ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NEW YORK, ET AL. S.S. KRESGE COMPANY v. SAME.

Supreme Court of United States.

Decided April 22, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Mr. Walter N. Seligsberg, with whom Mr. I. Maurice Wormser was on the brief, for appellants.

Messrs. Hamilton Ward, Attorney General of New York, and Henry S. Manley, Assistant Attorney General, were on the brief for appellees.


MR. JUSTICE HOLMES delivered the opinion of the Court.

These are suits brought by dealers in eye glasses for an injunction prohibiting the enforcement of chapter 379 of the New York Laws of 1928, which amends the Education Law by inserting two sections, of which the material portion makes it unlawful to sell at retail in any store or established place of business `any spectacles, eye glasses, or lenses for the correction of vision, unless a duly licensed physician...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases