1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 37 F.2d
  5. 37 F.2d 448 (1929)
 

JOHNSON v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA

Nos. 5013, 5014.

37 F.2d 448 (1929)

Laskey W. JOHNSON, Plaintiff in Error, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant in Error. Evva M. HERRON, Plaintiff in Error, v. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Defendant in Error.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided December 2, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Paul E. Lesh, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

W. W. Bride and F. H. Stephens, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

PER CURIAM.

These are writs of error to the municipal court, and involve an interpretation of the Act of June 4, 1924 (43 Stat. 367). Since the facts in these cases do not differ materially from the facts in District of Columbia v. Newman (No. 4803) 59 App. D. C. 163, 37 F.2d 444, decided February 25, 1929, in which an application for rehearing has this day been denied, the judgments in these cases are affirmed, with costs, on the...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases