1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 37 F.2d
  5. 37 F.2d 448 (1929)
 

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA v. STEINBERG

Nos. 4804-4807.

37 F.2d 448 (1929)

DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Flora G. STEINBERG, Defendant in Error. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edith W. ELY, Defendant in Error. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Madeline PADGETT, Defendant in Error. DISTRICT OF COLUMBIA, Plaintiff in Error, v. Edna Ellis HILTON, Defendant in Error.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Reargued February 4, 1929.

Decided February 25, 1929.

Motion of Second Rehearing Denied December 2, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

W. W. Bride and F. H. Stephens, both of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff in error.

Paul E. Lesh, of Washington, D. C., for defendants in error.

Before MARTIN, Chief Justice, and ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.

ROBB, Associate Justice.

These are writs of error to the municipal court, and involve the question just determined in No. 4803, District of Columbia v. Newman, 59 App. D. C. 163, 37 F.2d 444. For reasons there stated, the judgment in each case is reversed, with costs, and the causes are remanded for further proceedings not inconsistent herewith.

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases