1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 379 (1929)
 

JAMES H. BUNCE CO. v. EATON

No. 3330.

36 F.2d 379 (1929)

JAMES H. BUNCE CO., Inc., v. EATON, Internal Revenue Collector.

District Court, D. Connecticut.

December 5, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Cambria & Kosicki, of Middletown, Conn., for plaintiff.

John Buckley, U. S. Atty., and George H. Cohen, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Hartford, Conn., and C. M. Charest, Gen. Counsel, Bureau of Internal Revenue, and Eldon O. Hanson, Sp. Atty., Bureau of Internal Revenue, both of Washington, D. C., for defendant.

BURROWS, District Judge.

This action at law was instituted in the United States District Court for the District of Connecticut by the James H. Bunce Company, Inc., v. Eaton, Collector, to recover $8,994.64, alleged to have been erroneously collected from it as income and profits taxes — $2,028.22 for the year 1917 and $6,966.42 for the year 1918. Said taxpayer took an appeal to the United States Board of Tax Appeals from a deficiency in tax proposed to be assessed...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases