1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 31 F.2d
  5. 31 F.2d 10 (1929)
 

BARTELME v. MERCED IRR. DIST.

No. 5547.

31 F.2d 10 (1929)

BARTELME et al. v. MERCED IRR. DIST.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

Rehearing Denied April 4, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Grove J. Fink, Bartley C. Crum, and McGee & Mather, all of San Francisco, Cal., for appellants.

F. W. Henderson, of Merced, Cal., and Downey & Seymour, of Sacramento, Cal., for appellee.

Before GILBERT and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges, and NORCROSS, District Judge.

GILBERT, Circuit Judge.

The appellee is a public corporation, organized under the Irrigation District Law of California (St. 1897, p. 254, as amended and supplemented). It was engaged in an extensive irrigation project. For reservoir purposes it deemed it necessary to acquire title to the Horseshoe Bend ranch, the property of the appellants. The price demanded by the appellants was $150,000. The price offered by the appellee was $80,000. An understanding was reached...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases