1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 300 (1929)
 

THOMPSON v. CHAPMAN

Patent Appeals Nos. 2144, 2145.

36 F.2d 300 (1929)

THOMPSON v. CHAPMAN (two cases).

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 30, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alexander & Dowell, of Washington, D. C. (Arthur E. Dowell, of Washington, D. C., of counsel), for Thompson.

Morsell, Keeney & Morsell, of Milwaukee, Wis. (A. L. Morsell, of Milwaukee, Wis., of counsel), for Chapman.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

BLAND, Associate Judge.

The appeal and cross-appeal herein arise from interference proceedings in the Patent Office, which involved six counts relating to a continuous cooker of the type wherein cans containing vegetables, milk, etc., are moved in a continuous stream from one end of a single unit or tank to another, being passed through a heated body of water, the particular invention involved relating to the division of the apparatus into a plurality of heating zones...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases