1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 265 (1929)
 

GENUINE PANAMA HAT WORKS v. WEBB

36 F.2d 265 (1929)

GENUINE PANAMA HAT WORKS, Inc., v. WEBB et al.

District Court, S. D. New York.

October 24, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Goldstein & Goldstein, of New York City (S. S. Goldsmith, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff.

Cardozo & Nathan, of New York City (Michael H. Cardozo, Jr., and Aristotle Souval, both of New York City, of counsel), for defendant insurance companies.

Richards & Affeld, of New York City (S. S. Schweitzer, of New York City, of counsel), for defendant Webb.

WOOLSEY, District Judge.

The motion to remand is denied. The plaintiff is a corporation of the state of New York. The Concordia Fire Insurance Company of Milwaukee is a corporation of the state of Wisconsin. The Royal Insurance Company, Limited, of Liverpool, is a corporation existing under the laws of Great Britain. The defendant Webb, who is now alleged by the plaintiff to be the agent of each of the defendant insurance companies above named, is a citizen and resident...

NEVER MISS A DECISION. START YOUR SUBSCRIPTION.

Uncompromising quality. Enduring impact.
Your support ensures a bright future for independent legal reporting.

As you are aware we have offered this as a free subscription over the past years and we have now made it a paid service.Look forward to your continued patronage.

GET STARTED
OR

Read it with your Leagle account.
Sign in to continue


Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases