REYNOLDS SPRING CO. v. L. A. YOUNG INDUSTRIES

Nos. 5215, 5216.

36 F.2d 150 (1929)

REYNOLDS SPRING CO. v. L. A. YOUNG INDUSTRIES, Inc. L. A. YOUNG INDUSTRIES, Inc., v. REYNOLDS SPRING CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

December 3, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Otto F. Barthel, of Detroit, Mich., and Walter F. Murray, of Cincinnati, Ohio (Barthel, Flanders & Barthel, of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for Reynolds Spring Co.

Otis A. Earl, of Kalamazoo, Mich., and Melville Church, of Washington, D. C. (Chappell & Earl, of Kalamazoo, Mich., on the brief), for Young Industries.

Before DENISON, MOORMAN, and HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judges.


HICKENLOOPER, Circuit Judge.

Three patents are involved in the present appeal and cross-appeal. Patent No. 1,058,285, issued to L. A. Young, April 8, 1913, covers the use of the S type of base frame, or marginal strip on the base frame, in spring upholstery constructions such as seats for automobiles. Claims 1, 2, 3, 5, and 7 are in suit and were held valid and infringed. Patent No. 1,428,701, issued to Otto A. Michelis, September 12, 1922, claims in combination with...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases