1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 36 F.2d
  5. 36 F.2d 138 (1929)
 

IN RE BAKER

Patent Appeal No. 2178.

36 F.2d 138 (1929)

In re BAKER et al.

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals.

December 19, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gifford & Bull, of New York City (G. F. Scull, of New York City, and C. P. Byrnes, of Pittsburgh, Pa., of counsel), for appellants.

T. A. Hostetler, of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

Before GRAHAM, Presiding Judge, and BLAND, HATFIELD, GARRETT, and LENROOT, Associate Judges.

HATFIELD, Associate Judge.

This is an appeal from a decision of the Board of Appeals affirming the decision of the examiner denying all claims — five in number — in appellants' application for an alleged invention relating to a means and a process for uniform distribution of fuel to a stoker.

Claims 1, 2, and 3 relate to an alleged novel apparatus, while 4 and 5 are process claims.

Claims 1, 3, and 4 are illustrative. They read:

...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases