GARRETT, Associate Judge.
Appellant claims invention relating to the art of typewriting, claims 1, 2, 3, and 4 being for a method patent, and claims 5, 6, 7, and 8 for a web-typing apparatus. These claims were successively rejected by the Examiner, the Board of Examiners in Chief, and the Commissioner of Patents, being brought before us by appeal from the decision of the latter, rendered December 21, 1927.
Claim No. 2 is typical of the four involved in the...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.