1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 33 F.2d
  5. 33 F.2d 997 (1929)
 

PEARCE v. UNION NAT. BANK

No. 665.

33 F.2d 997 (1929)

PEARCE et al. v. UNION NAT. BANK.

District Court, N. D. Ohio, W. D.

January 26, 1929.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Marshall, Melhorn, Marlar & Martin, of Toledo, Ohio, for plaintiffs.

George E. Schroth, of Tiffin, Ohio, and Tracy, Chapman & Welles, of Toledo, Ohio, for defendant.

HAHN, District Judge.

The defendant, on October 22, 1928, when this cause came on for trial, filed its motion to dismiss the cause, for the reason that the amended bill filed herein does not state facts sufficient to entitle plaintiffs to equitable relief. Prior proceedings in the case were, briefly, as follows:

Plaintiffs filed their bill September 1, 1926. The defendant, on September 21, 1926, filed a motion to dismiss on the ground, among others, that plaintiffs...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases