IN RE SIEGLER

No. 52.

31 F.2d 972 (1929)

In re SIEGLER. Appeal of SMYTH.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

April 1, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Wise & Seligsberg and David W. Kahn, all of New York City, for appellant trustee.

Robert P. Levis, of New York City, for appellee.

Before L. HAND, SWAN, and CHASE, Circuit Judges.


CHASE, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).

Any difference of opinion respecting the force and effect of a turnover order, which may have prevailed before the decision of the Supreme Court, in Prela v. Hubshman, 49 S.Ct. 173, 73 L. Ed. ___, is now out of place in any discussion of the subject. The amount to be paid is conclusively fixed by the order, and no evidence can properly be considered on a motion for commitment for contempt, except that which...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases