UNIVERSAL RIM CO. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION

No. 5082.

31 F.2d 969 (1929)

UNIVERSAL RIM CO. v. GENERAL MOTORS CORPORATION et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 9, 1929.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur Wm. Nelson, of Chicago, Ill. (Edward N. Pagelsen, of Detroit, Mich., on the brief), for appellant.

Lewis W. McCandless, of Detroit, Mich. (Stevenson, Butzel, Eaman & Long, of Detroit, Mich., and Rector, Hibben, Davis & Macauley, of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellees.

Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and ANDERSON, District Judge.


MOORMAN, Circuit Judge.

There is no merit in the contention that the court should not have permitted the defendants to file a motion to dismiss, but should have required the filing of an answer. The term "answer," as used in the stipulation giving defendants additional time for filing answer, is to be construed, we think, to include a motion to dismiss. New Jersey v. New York, 31 U. S. (6 Pet.) 323, 8 L. Ed. 414; Martin v. Baltimore & O. R. Co.,

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases