PEERLESS WOOLEN MILLS v. ROSE

No. 485.

24 F.2d 576 (1928)

PEERLESS WOOLEN MILLS v. ROSE, Collector of Internal Revenue.

District Court, N. D. Georgia.

January 12, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Alston, Alston, Foster & Moise, of Atlanta, Ga., J. R. Sherrod, of Washington, D. C., and A. W. Taber, of Chattanooga, Tenn., for plaintiff.

C. P. Goree, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Atlanta, Ga., and William E. Davis, of Washington, D. C., for defendant.


SIBLEY, District Judge.

The main question is the power of the court to interfere with the collection of the tax. Congress, having full control of the jurisdiction and powers of the District Court, has, by Revised Statutes, § 3224 (26 USCA § 154; Comp. St. § 5947), forbidden it to interfere in the collection of any taxes. The contention that the present taxes are barred by the statute of limitations and therefore to be enjoined as a whole I cannot sustain...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases