1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 24 F.2d
  5. 24 F.2d 383 (1928)
 

COSTAN v. MANILA ELECTRIC CO.

No. 98.

24 F.2d 383 (1928)

COSTAN v. MANILA ELECTRIC CO. et al.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

On Petition for Reargument, February 6, 1928.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Frank L. Tyson, of New York City (Ralph O. L. Fay, of New York City, of counsel), for plaintiff in error.

Spence & Hopkins, of New York City (Kenneth M. Spence, of New York City, of counsel), for defendants in error.

Before MANTON, SWAN, and AUGUSTUS N. HAND, Circuit Judges.

SWAN, Circuit Judge.

There was complete lack of jurisdiction as to the Manila Electric Company. It is a Philippine corporation, and as such is not an alien. See Gonzales v. Williams, 192 U.S. 1, 13, 24 S.Ct. 177, 48 L. Ed. 317; Toyota v. United States, 268 U.S. 402, 411, 45 S.Ct. 563, 69 L. Ed. 1016. Neither is it a citizen of a state. Hooe v. Jamieson, 166 U.S. 395, 17...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases