INDIANA QUARTERED OAK CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION

No. 271.

26 F.2d 340 (1928)

INDIANA QUARTERED OAK CO. v. FEDERAL TRADE COMMISSION.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Second Circuit.

May 14, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Charles Neave, of New York City (Daniel R. Forbes, of Washington, D. C., and Alexander C. Neave, of New York City, of counsel), for petitioner.

F. Granville Munson, Major, Judge Advocate, U. S. Army, of Washington, D. C., for government of Philippine Islands.

Robert E. Healy, Chief Counsel, Adrien F. Busick, Asst. Chief Counsel, and M. Markham Flannery, all of Washington, D. C., for respondent.

Marcus Borchardt, of Washington, D. C., George Gordon Battle, of New York City, and Davis, Polk, Wardwell, Gardiner & Reed, of New York City (Havens Grant, of New York City, of counsel), amici curiæ.

Before MANTON, L. HAND, and SWAN, Circuit Judges.


MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The Federal Trade Commission, after protracted hearings, resulting in a very large record, by its order restrained the petitioner from "advertising, describing, or otherwise designating or selling, or offering for sale, under the term `mahogany' or `Philippine mahogany,' * * * woods known under the common or trade names `red lauan,' `white lauan,' `tanguile,' `narra,' `apitong,' `bataan,' `lamao,' `orion,' `batang,' `bagaac,' `batak,' and `balachacan...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases