SCHOCK INDEPENDENT OIL CO. v. SINCLAIR REFINING CO.

No. 2026.

24 F.2d 286 (1928)

SCHOCK INDEPENDENT OIL CO. v. SINCLAIR REFINING CO.

Court of Appeals of District of Columbia.

Decided February 6, 1928.

Petition for Rehearing Denied February 18, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

A. M. Houghton and A. R. Henry, both of Washington, D. C., for appellant.

E. S. Rogers, of Chicago, Ill., and T. L. Mead, Jr., and N. J. Jewett, both of Washington, D. C., for appellee.

By stipulation of counsel this case was heard before two members of the court, ROBB and VAN ORSDEL, Associate Justices.


ROBB, Associate Justice.

Appeal from concurrent decisions of the Patent Office tribunals in a trade-mark opposition proceeding, in which the opposition was sustained and registration of the word "Sico" as a trade-mark for petroleum products was refused appellant.

In 1916 the appellee, the Sinclair Refining Company, adopted the word "Sinco" as a trade-mark for petroleum products, and in 1919 it secured registration of this mark. From the time of its adoption...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases