WINE RY. APPLIANCE CO. v. ENTERPRISE RY. EQUIPMENT CO.

No. 4782.

25 F.2d 236 (1928)

WINE RY. APPLIANCE CO. v. ENTERPRISE RY. EQUIPMENT CO.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit.

April 6, 1928.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Gilbert P. Ritter, of Washington, D. C., and Chares W. Owen, of Toledo, Ohio (Owen & Owen, of Toledo, Ohio, and Ritter & Mechlin, of Washington, D. C., on the brief), for appellant.

Joseph Harris, of Chicago, Ill. (George I. Haight and Haight, Adcock, Haight & Harris, all of Chicago, Ill., on the brief), for appellee.

Before DENISON and MOORMAN, Circuit Judges, and ANDREW M. J. COCHRAN, District Judge.


DENISON, Circuit Judge.

The District Court found no infringement of either patent. We speak of appellant and appellee as plaintiff and defendant, respectively. In view of the accumulation of undecided cases, we state in this case only our conclusions, in form sufficient, it is thought, for the information of counsel.

Claim 19 of Cremean is not infringed. The principles of lever action do not permit us to find a fulcrum located on the weight.

We hesitate...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases