MACK, Circuit Judge (after stating the facts as above).
On the oral argument, the attempt to sustain the claim to equitable relief was practically abandoned. Clearly, title to the seized property was vested in the United States under the Trading with the Enemy Act (Comp. St. §§ 3115½a-3115½j). Any suit to redress the alleged wrongful disposition of the seized property must be brought by the United States; any claim to the property so seized or...
Let's get started
Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.
- Updated daily.
- Uncompromising quality.
- Complete, Accurate, Current.