1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 19 F.2d
  5. 19 F.2d 73 (1927)
 

SILK v. UNITED STATES

Nos. 7359, 7360.

19 F.2d 73 (1927)

SILK v. UNITED STATES. MEEK v. SAME.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Eighth Circuit.

April 12, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur F. Mullen, of Omaha, Neb., for plaintiff in error Silk.

George A. Keyser, Asst. U. S. Atty., of Omaha, Neb. (James C. Kinsler, U. S. Atty., Ambrose C. Epperson, Asst. U. S. Atty., and Andrew C. Scott, Asst. U. S. Atty., all of Omaha, Neb., on the brief), for the United States.

Before VAN VALKENBURGH and BOOTH, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, District Judge.

PHILLIPS, District Judge.

Silk and Meek were jointly charged by indictment containing seven counts. The first count charged them with a conspiracy to violate the National Prohibition Act (Comp. St. § 10138¼ et seq.). The second, fourth, and sixth charged them with unlawful transportation of intoxicating liquor. The third, fifth, and seventh charged them with unlawful sale of intoxicating liquor. Meek was found guilty upon counts 1, 2, 3, 4, and 6. Silk was...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases