1. Home
  2. Browse Decisions
  3. F.2d
  4. 21 F.2d
  5. 21 F.2d 588 (1927)
 

FARBWERKE VORMALS MEISTER LUCIUS & BRÜNING v. DIARSENAL CO.,

21 F.2d 588 (1927)

FARBWERKE VORMALS MEISTER LUCIUS & BRÜNING v. DIARSENAL CO., Inc., et al.

District Court, W. D. New York.

March 10, 1927.

Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Edward H. Cumpston, of Rochester, N. Y., for plaintiff.

Percy R. Smith, of Buffalo, N. Y., for defendants.

HAZEL, District Judge.

The defendant's motion is to dismiss the bill upon the ground that one year had expired following the end of the war, wherein an action in equity, against the licensee, under the provisions of section 10 (f) of the Trading with the Enemy Act (Comp. St. § 3115½ee), could be commenced. The bill of complaint admittedly was filed on Saturday, July 1, 1922; the process of subpœna issued by...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases