DOUGLAS-PECTIN CORPORATION v. ARMOUR & CO.


21 F.2d 584 (1927)

DOUGLAS-PECTIN CORPORATION v. ARMOUR & CO.

District Court, W. D. New York.

February 1, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Arthur E. Sutherland, of Rochester, N. Y., and Melville Church, of Washington, D. C., for plaintiff.

Cromwell, Greist & Warden, of Chicago, Ill., and Louis L. Babcock, of Buffalo, N. Y. (William Navarre Cromwell, of Chicago, Ill., of counsel), for defendant.


HAZEL, District Judge.

This is a motion for reopening the case, before entry of decree, to take additional testimony, claimed to be newly discovered, to further enlighten the court regarding the asserted invalidity of plaintiff's patent No. 1,235,666 (application filed April 12, 1915, and granted August 7, 1917), which covers a process for removing turbidity from a pectous concentrate made under Douglas patent No. 1,082,682. Douglas Pectin Corp. v. Armour & Co...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases