RENDLEMAN v. UNITED STATES

No. 4977.

18 F.2d 27 (1927)

RENDLEMAN v. UNITED STATES.

Circuit Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit.

March 21, 1927.


Attorney(s) appearing for the Case

Warren Hardy and Henry Clay Agnew, both of Seattle, Wash., for plaintiff in error.

Thos. P. Revellee, U. S. Atty., and Paul D. Coles, Asst. U. S. Atty., both of Seattle, Wash.

Before HUNT, RUDKIN, and DIETRICH, Circuit Judges.


HUNT, Circuit Judge.

On the trial of Rendleman, plaintiff in error, who was convicted of the unlawful possession of morphine, and of having dealt in morphine without having registered or paid a special tax as required by law, the court ruled that Rendleman's wife was not a competent witness in his behalf. Review of the ruling is sought.

The case of Louie Ding v. United States (C. C. A. 1918) 247 F. 12, presented the question of the competency of a witness...

Let's get started

Leagle.com

Welcome to the leading source of independent legal reporting
Sign on now to see your case.
Or view more than 10 million decisions and orders.

  • Updated daily.
  • Uncompromising quality.
  • Complete, Accurate, Current.

Listed below are the cases that are cited in this Featured Case. Click the citation to see the full text of the cited case. Citations are also linked in the body of the Featured Case.

Cited Cases

  • No Cases Found

Listed below are those cases in which this Featured Case is cited. Click on the case name to see the full text of the citing case.

Citing Cases